The Position of Geography in Secondary School Curricula: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum and Malaysia’s KSSM

Authors

  • Fauzan Asyim Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Dedi Hermon Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Febriandi Febriandi Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.9451

Keywords:

geography education, secondary school curriculum, curriculum positioning, merdeka

Abstract

This study examines the position and strategic status of Geography as a secondary school subject in Indonesia and Malaysia, focusing on its compulsory or elective placement, curriculum depth, and contribution to students’ geopolitical understanding. The research aims to highlight the novelty of subject positioning analysis rather than pedagogy alone, addressing how curricular structures shape geopolitical literacy outcomes. Employing a qualitative descriptive comparative design, the study integrates curriculum document analysis, semi-structured stakeholder interviews, and SWOT analysis to identify similarities, differences, strengths, and challenges in both education systems. Data sources include Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum and Malaysia’s Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM), supported by relevant literature and educator perspectives. Key findings show that Geography holds a strategic role in both countries by fostering spatial and geospatial literacy, regional awareness, and understanding of national and global issues, yet its positioning differs: Indonesia emphasizes Geography within social science specialization with stronger geopolitical orientation, while Malaysia introduces it at lower secondary but shifts it to an elective subject at upper secondary with broader environmental and development themes. The study implies that strengthening Geography’s geopolitical contribution requires clearer curriculum integration, sustained subject continuity, enhanced teacher professional development, and wider use of geospatial technologies to better equip students for contemporary geopolitical challenges.

References

Alm Fjellborg, A., & Kramming, K. (2022). Sustainable development: Exploring gender differences in the Swedish national test in geography for grade 9. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 31(3), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2021.1927366

Anum, A., Eripuddin, E., Rahayu, P., & Irmawati, L. (2025). Integration of Indonesian Language and Literature Learning in the Merdeka Curriculum: A Holistic Approach to Enhancing Literacy and Cultural Appreciation in Secondary Schools. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(001), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v5i001.518

Bagoly-Simó, P. (2023). Geography’s unkept promises of education for sustainable development (ESD) on geography’s wasted potential to educate for a more sustainable future. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 32(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2023.2158631

Bendl, T., Storrøsæter, H., Madsen, L. M., Trokšiar, D., de la Martinière, R., Liu, S., Serame, S., Mitchell, J. T., Bagoly-Simó, P., Duan, Y., & Kidman, G. (2025). An international perspective on geography curricula: paving a way forward for geographical thinking. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 34(3), 294–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2025.2513535

Cho, C. K. (2023). Use of photovoice in pre-service geography teachers’ conceptions of geography. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2235171

Garside, C. (2020). Seeing the forest through the trees: A challenge facing communication across the curriculum programs. Communication Education, 51(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520216500

Golightly, A. (2025). Relationships between geography teachers’ SDL skills, participation in self-directed professional development and the use of learner-centred instructional strategies. South African Geographical Journal, 107(4), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2025.2472663

Golightly, A., & Sprenger, S. (2024). A Balancing Act: South African Geography teachers’ Implementation of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Instructional Strategies in Their Classrooms. Journal of Geography, 123(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2024.2307051

Hadiyanto, Noferdiman, Syamsurizal, Muhaimin, & Krisantia, I. (2021). Students’ soft skills, hard skills, and competitiveness (SHC): A suggested model for Indonesian higher education curriculum. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.2.12

Hall, T., & Lin, S. (2024). Teaching sports geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 48(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2023.2284177

Hallingfors, H., & Åström Elmersjö, H. (2025). Guarding the boundaries: a Swedish policy debate about geography and education for sustainable development. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2025.2457171

Harrison, J. (2022). Geography and public policy: taking responsibility in research and teaching. Space and Polity, 26(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2022.2098647

Hashim, M., Mahat, H., Nayan, N., Saleh, Y., & See, K. L. (2019). Relationship Matrix Comparing University Geography Courses and Secondary School Standard Curriculum in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v8-i2/5641

Healy, G., Walshe, N., & Mitchell, D. (2025). Teachers’ perspectives and practices of climate change and sustainability education in primary and secondary school geography in England. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2025.2595415

Heidari, N., Sebastian Feser, M., Scholten, N., Schwippert, K., & Sprenger, S. (2023). Language in primary and secondary geography education: a systematic literature review of empirical geography education research. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 32(3), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2022.2154964

Hodgkins, R., To, L. S., & Matthews, T. (2025). The IPCC reports and HE Geography: opportunities lost and found. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 49(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2024.2333293

Jordan, D. R., Shortridge, A., & Darden, J. T. (2022). The Advancing Geography Through Diversity Program: A Framework to Address the Persistent Underrepresentation of Domestic Racial and Ethnic Minorities in U.S. Geography Doctoral Programs. Professional Geographer, 74(3), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2021.2004900

Knecht, P., & Spurná, M. (2022). Does specialization in geography teaching determine teachers’ conceptions of geography teaching? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 31(3), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2021.1970967

Lathifah, Z. K., Fauziah, R. S. P., Rusli, R. K., Suherman, I., Ariffin, T. F. T., & Nordin, H. (2025). A comparative study of community service integration in high school education: insights from Malaysian and Indonesian teachers’ practices. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2567734

McDaniel, P. N. (2022). Teaching, Learning, and Exploring the Geography of North America with Virtual Globes and Geovisual Narratives. Journal of Geography, 121(4), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2022.2119597

Mitchell, D. (2025). Describing the professional knowledge of geography mentors–knowing and feeling. Teacher Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2025.2495211

Paulus, L., & Nolan, K. (2021). Geography Achievement and Opportunity to Learn: A Focus on Curriculum Organization and Content. Journal of Geography, 120(6), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.2001030

Pearce, R. H., Chadwick, M. A., & Francis, R. (2024). Experiential learning in physical geography using arduino low-cost environmental sensors. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 48(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2022.2155804

Ratnasari, D., Darsiharjo, & Yani, A. (2019). Comparative Study of Geography Education Curriculum in Indonesia and Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 286(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/286/1/012004

Rushton, E. A. C., Nayeri, C., Beardmore Crowther, D., Griffiths, L., Newell, P., Sayliss, Z., Wise, J., & Zeina, A. (2022). What enables student geography teachers to thrive during their PGCE year and beyond? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 46(4), 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1978064

Sakaue, H., Watanabe, T., Nagata, T., & Ito, N. (2024). Perspectives and characteristics of Education for Sustainable Development in high school geography: an analysis of the Japanese national curriculum. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2024.2442807

Smit, E., Tuithof, H., Savelsbergh, E., & Béneker, T. (2023). Geography Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Systematic Review. Journal of Geography, 122(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2023.2173796

Solem, M. (2023). Geography Achievement and Future Geographers. Professional Geographer, 75(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2022.2081227

Supianto, S., Marmoah, J., Indrastoeti, S., Poerwanti, S., Istiyati, H., & Mahfud, S. (2023). A Comparative Study of Education Equity Policy in Remote Areas in Indonesia and Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(2), 125–134.

Vollmer, H. J., & Rothgangel, M. (2025). General Subject Didactics. Development–theoretical insights–empirical results. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2518392

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20

How to Cite

Asyim, F., Hermon, D., & Febriandi, F. (2026). The Position of Geography in Secondary School Curricula: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum and Malaysia’s KSSM. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(1), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.9451

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): MARCH 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.