Enhancing EFL Learner Engagement in Large Classrooms through Padlet

Authors

  • Komilie Situmorang Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1481-485X
  • Santa Maya Pramusita Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
  • Bima Adi Saputra Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7714

Keywords:

EFL, Engagement, Padlet, Gamification, collaborative learning

Abstract

Engaging students in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms, particularly large ones, remains a persistent challenge due to rigid structures and limited opportunities for interaction. While gamification is commonly used to boost engagement, its competitive elements can trigger anxiety and hinder participation, especially among less confident learners. This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to explore the effectiveness of Padlet—a non-competitive, collaborative digital platform—in promoting student engagement. A total of 202 first-year nursing students participated in a 14-week course in which Padlet was integrated into classroom activities. Data were collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with selected participants. Quantitative findings indicated high levels of agreement across five engagement dimensions: motivation, interactivity, learning opportunities, ease of use, and language learning support. Qualitative analysis revealed four dominant themes: Padlet's social media-like appeal, its role in facilitating safe and active collaboration, the creation of an interactive classroom atmosphere, and peer learning through shared content. Students reported increased willingness to participate, reduced anxiety, and greater comfort in expressing ideas. Padlet functioned as a low-anxiety, learner-centered space that encouraged participation, particularly among shy or low-proficiency students. While it may not directly improve language proficiency, its affective benefits foster a positive foundation for language development. Padlet offers an inclusive, psychologically safe alternative to competitive gamification, making it a valuable tool for enhancing student engagement in large EFL classrooms.

References

Ardi, P., & Rianita, E. (2022). Leveraging gamification into EFL grammar class to boost student engagement. Teaching English with Technology, 22(2), 50–63. http://www.tewtjournal.org

Chavan, D. K. (2015). Students’ engagement: Way for effective teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Research Study, 1(3), 185–191.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Case studies. In Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539-19

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.†In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Ellis, D. (2015). Using Padlet to increase student engagement in lectures. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Learning (ECEL), 195–198.

Fisher, C. D. (2017). Padlet: An online tool for learner engagement and collaboration. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(1), 163–165. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0055

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Fu, Y., Zhang, L., Zhao, S., & Chen, Y. (2021). Perceptions of non-English major college students on learning English vocabulary with gamified apps. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(18), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i18.24125

Fuchs, B. (2014). The writing is on the wall: Using Padlet for whole-class engagement. UKnowledge Presentations. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_present/80/

Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019

Henry, A., & Thorsen, C. (2018). Disaffection and agentic engagement: ‘Redesigning’ activities to enable authentic self-expression. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818795976

Hojjat Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 934–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298

Hwang, G.-J., Hsu, T.-C., Lai, C.-L., & Hsueh, C.-J. (2017). Interaction of problem-based gaming and learning anxiety in language students’ English listening performance and progressive behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 106, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.010

Kim, V., & Kim, J. (2020). Roles of teacher feedback in promoting effective English-medium instruction of a business subject. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(3), 1004–1015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345753167

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Lailatur Rofiah, N., Abasha’ar, M., Aba, M., Ar, S., & Waluyo, B. (2024). The efficacy of integrating Padlet-mediated feedback into writing lessons: A case of low-proficiency students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 19, 317–343.

Lambert, C. (2017). Tasks, affect and second language performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817736644

Llorente-Cejudo, C., & Almenara, J. (2013). Blended learning: Attitudes, satisfaction, academic performance and online communication in processes of university training. The New Educational Review, 31(1), 28–39.

Mitchell, K., Shortt, S., Tilak, I. K. B. M., & Akinkuolie, B. (2023). Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 517–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1933540

Orhan Göksün, D., & Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers & Education, 135, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.015

Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000095

Rego, I. (2015). Mobile language learning: How gamification improves the experience. In Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age (pp. 705–720). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54146-9_76

Saman Ebadi, R., & Mohamadi, M. (2023). Exploring EFL learners’ perspectives on using Kahoot as a game-based student response system. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2338–2350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1881798

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818

Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot it or not? Can games be motivating in learning grammar? Teaching English with Technology, 16(3), 17–36. http://www.tewtjournal.org

Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680

Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O’Reilly Media.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28

How to Cite

Situmorang, K., Pramusita, S. M., & Saputra, B. A. (2025). Enhancing EFL Learner Engagement in Large Classrooms through Padlet. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(3), 4578–4587. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7714

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 3 (2025): SEPTEMBER 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.