Students’ Perception Toward Teachers’ Implementation of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in EFL Classroom at Madrasah Aliyah

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4529

Keywords:

Students’ Perception, Teachers’ Implementation, TPACK

Abstract

Technology and education are two things that influence each other. Technology in education is not only about the tools, applications, and software but also about how the teachers integrate the technology to present the learning model and learning content in learning activity. Therefore, this research aimed to find out the students’ perceptions toward teachers’ implementation of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in EFL classroom. This research is descriptive research and was located at one of madrasah Aliyah in Pekanbaru. There were 106 tenth-grade students as the respondents. A questionnaire is used to collect the research data on students’ perceptions. The finding revealed that students’ perception toward teachers’ implementation of TPACK in EFL classroom is positive perception, with a total mean score is 3.02, which means EFL students have a positive perception about teachers’ implementation of TPACK in EFL classrooms. Based on this result, it can be said that the teachers have the ability and the awareness related to the importance of implementing TPACK to support the teaching and learning process, especially to increase students’ comprehension and motivation in learning English.

References

Akyuz, S., & Yavuz, F. (2015). Digital Learning in EFL Classrooms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 766–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.07.176

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2009). Introduction to Research in Education. 696. https://books.google.com/books/about/Introduction_to_Research_in_Education.html?id=FqF7n0zGJm0C

Baser, D., Kopcha, T. J., & Ozden, M. Y. (2016). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456

Drajati, N. A., Tan, L., Haryati, S., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Zainnuri, H. (2018). Investigating English language teachers in developing TPACK and multimodal literacy. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9806

Ersanli, C. Y. (2016). Improving Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of Pre-Service English Language Teachers. International Education Studies, 9(5), 18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p18

Fathi, J., & Yousefifard, S. (2019). Assessing Language Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): EFL Students’ Perspectives. Research in English Language Pedagogy RELP, 7(1), 255–282. https://doi.org/10.30486/relp.2019.665888

Ginting, D., Fahmi, F., Barella, Y., Hasbi, M., Kadnawi, K., Rojabi, A. R., & Zumrudiana, A. (2022). Students’ perception on TPACK practices on online language classes in the midst of pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(4), 1995–2009. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.23014

Hafifah, G. N., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2020). Teachers’ ICT literacy and ICT integration in ELT in the Indonesian higher education setting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.762050

Ilmi, M., Drajati, N. A., & Putra, K. A. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of EFL Teachers’ TPACK Knowledge in Online Classroom Environment. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2494

Irwanto, I. (2021). Research Trends in Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A Systematic Literature Review from 2010 to 2021. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 69–81.

Kassem, M. A. M. (2018). Balancing technology with pedagogy in english language classroom: Teachers’ perspective. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(9), 1–19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329248065

Kusuma, I. P. I. (2021). Tpack-related programs for pre-service english teachers: An in-depth analysis on efforts and issues of ict integration. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.28820

Liu, S., Liu, H., Yu, Y., Li, Y., & Wen, T. (2014). TPACK : A New Dimension to EFL Teachers ’ PCK. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 681–693.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1–16.

Najjari, R. (2021). Assessment and Development of Iranian EFL Teachers ’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge ( TPACK ) Keywords : TPACK Perceptions , CALL Literacy , TPACK , TPACK Workshop The succeeding outcome of technology-based language teaching is bound to the t. 8191(4), 161–193. https://doi.org/10.22099/JTLS.2021.39038.2914

Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., Marandi, S. S., & Wang, S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1632010

Ningtyas, P. I. A., Sahiruddin, & Degeng, P. D. D. (2023). the Perspectives of Efl Students on the Technological. Journey, 6, 11–23.

Pimentel, J. L. (2019). Some Biases in Likert Scaling Usage and its Correction. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 45(1), 183–191. http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied

Ringotama, A. A. (2020). Pre- Service Teachers ’ Perception and Vision about TPACK and Its Implementation Pre- Service Teachers ’ Perception and Vision about TPACK and Its Implementation Arrizalu Arsa Ringotama. 20(1).

Tai, S. J. D. (2015). From tpack-in-action workshops to classrooms: Call competency developed and integrated. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(1), 139–164.

Taopan, L. L., Drajati, N. A., & Sumardi. (2020). Tpack Framework: Challenges and Opportunities in Efl Classrooms. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 3(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.33603/rill.v3i1.2763

Tsai, P. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Preservice teachers’ conceptions of teaching using mobile devices and the quality of technology integration in lesson plans. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12613

Tseng, J. J., Lien, Y. J., & Chen, H. J. (2016). Using a teacher support group to develop teacher knowledge of Mandarin teaching via web conferencing technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.903978

Tütüniş, B., Ünal, K., & Babanoğlu, P. (2022). ICT (WEB TOOLS) FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS: TPACK FRAMEWORK AND USAGE. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 2(1), 95–107. https://globets.org/journal/index.php/IJETS/article/view/39

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Hayati, A., & Zaim, M. (2024). Students’ Perception Toward Teachers’ Implementation of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in EFL Classroom at Madrasah Aliyah. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4529

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2024): AL-ISHLAH: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.