Garuda Indonesia Flagship High School as Educational Reform: A Critical Analysis of Meritocracy, Inclusivity, and Social Justice

Authors

  • Ikrom Shaliadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9726

Keywords:

critical policy discourse analysis, educational reform, inclusive meritocracy, social justice, SMA Unggul Garuda Indonesia

Abstract

The Garuda Indonesia Flagship High School (SUGI) initiative represents a new educational reform designed to promote scientific excellence while expanding access to quality education for students from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The coexistence of merit-based selection and affirmative access mechanisms raises important questions regarding how contemporary educational policy negotiates the competing demands of excellence, inclusion, and social justice. This study aims to critically examine the policy design and policy discourse underpinning the SUGI initiative through the perspectives of meritocracy, symbolic elitism, and educational justice. A qualitative document-based research design was employed using Critical Policy Discourse Analysis (CPDA) integrated with the Policy Cycle Framework. The analysis drew upon official policy documents, government publications, historical records concerning RSBI/SBI, national media reports, and relevant scholarly literature published between 2012 and 2025. Data were analyzed through open coding, axial coding, thematic interpretation, and critical discourse analysis. The findings identify three interconnected policy discourses: inclusive meritocracy, symbolic elitism, and conditional affirmation. While SUGI demonstrates a stronger commitment to affirmative educational support than previous excellence-oriented initiatives by providing scholarships, boarding facilities, and comprehensive assistance for disadvantaged students, access remains dependent upon highly selective merit-based criteria, resulting in a model of conditional meritocratic inclusion. These findings suggest that contemporary educational reform in Indonesia seeks to reconcile educational excellence, global competitiveness, and social justice through hybrid policy narratives rather than replacing meritocratic principles. The study contributes to the literature on educational policy by advancing a critical understanding of how inclusion and excellence are simultaneously constructed within state-sponsored educational reform, while providing a conceptual basis for future empirical studies examining policy implementation and educational outcomes.

References

Abrahams, J. (2024). Schooling inequality: Aspirations, opportunities and the reproduction of social class. Policy Press.

Ball, S. J. (2012). Foucault, power, and education. Routledge.

Dias, D. (2015). Has massification of higher education led to more equity? Clues for a reflection on Portuguese education arena. Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 103–120.

Dodillet, S. (2019). Inclusive elite education in Sweden: Insights from implementing excellence programs into an egalitarian school culture. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(2), 258–271.

Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2023. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi. (2025). Pedoman penyelenggaraan SMA Unggul Garuda Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi.

Koh, A. (2014). Doing class analysis in Singapore's elite education: Unravelling the smokescreen of meritocratic talk. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.888308

Koutsouris, G., Stentiford, L., & Norwich, B. (2022). A critical exploration of inclusion policies of elite UK universities. British Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 878–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3799

Liasidou, A., & Symeou, L. (2018). Neoliberal versus social justice reforms in education policy and practice: Discourses, politics and disability rights in education. Critical Studies in Education, 59(2), 149–166.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2012). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-X/2012 tentang Sekolah Bertaraf Internasional (RSBI/SBI). Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Murtiningsih, S. (2016). Kebijakan RSBI dan ketimpangan akses pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 21(2), 145–159.

Owens, J., & de St Croix, T. (2020). Engines of social mobility? Navigating meritocratic education discourse in an unequal society. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1708863

Pozo-Armentia, A. del, Reyero, D., & Gil Cantero, F. (2020). The pedagogical limitations of inclusive education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(10), 1064–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1723549

Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 116 Tahun 2025 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sekolah Menengah Atas Unggul Garuda. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Ruan, J., Zhang, Y., & Liu, X. (2023). Educational excellence and rural inclusion in China's selective secondary schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(3), 455–470.

Walton, E., & Engelbrecht, P. (2024). Inclusive education in South Africa: Path dependencies and emergences. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(10), 2138–2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2061608

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Shaliadi, I. (2026). Garuda Indonesia Flagship High School as Educational Reform: A Critical Analysis of Meritocracy, Inclusivity, and Social Justice. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(2), 2371–2382. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9726

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): JUNE 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.