The Effectiveness of the Interactive KOMPAS Learning Model in Improving Junior High School Students’ Social Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Authors

  • Salma Miftakhul Jannah Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Rini Triastuti Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Hendri Nuryadi Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9537

Keywords:

KOMPAS learning model, social skills, pancasila education

Abstract

Students’ social skills are essential for supporting communication, collaboration, empathy, responsibility, and conflict resolution in classroom learning. However, teacher-centered instruction often limits students’ opportunities to practice these competencies meaningfully. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the Interactive KOMPAS Learning Model in improving junior high school students’ social skills in Pancasila Education. A quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group design was employed. The participants were 70 eighth-grade students at State Junior High School 1 Sukodadi, consisting of 35 students in the experimental group and 35 students in the control group, selected through cluster sampling. The experimental group received instruction using the Interactive KOMPAS Learning Model, while the control group received conventional teaching. Data were collected using a validated social skills instrument covering communication, cooperation, empathy, responsibility, and conflict resolution. Instrument validity was confirmed using Aiken’s V, and reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Data were analyzed using normality, homogeneity, N-Gain, and independent sample t-tests. The results showed that the experimental group achieved a higher N-Gain score of 62.11% than the control group, which reached 45.17%. The independent sample t-test also indicated a significant difference between groups, with t = 14.21 and p = 0.000. These findings demonstrate that the Interactive KOMPAS Learning Model is effective in enhancing students’ social skills and can serve as an innovative instructional strategy for strengthening civic competence in Pancasila Education.

References

Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136.

Banks, J. A. (2016). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). Routledge.

Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. (2019). Emotional intelligence: Building stronger connections. Basic Books.

CASEL. (2020). What is SEL? Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. https://casel.org

Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Devi, L. S., Rejekiningsih, T., & Rusnaini, R. (2022). Learning in digital era: Analysis of civic education learning materials for students in junior high school. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.47908

Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (2015). Handbook of social and emotional learning. Guilford Press.

Elias, M. J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2015). Social and emotional learning: Research and practice. Guilford Press.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54.

Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism. Corwin.

Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2015). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(3), 115–131.

Jayadiputra, E., Karim, A. A., Sapriya, S., & Rahmat, R. (2023). The Pancasila and Civic Education curriculum model at 21st century. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 20(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v20i1.49455

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2018). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 491–525.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. Theory Into Practice, 56(3), 169–178.

JureviÄienÄ—, M., KaffemanienÄ—, I., & RuÅ¡kus, J. (2012). Concept and structural components of social skills. Baltic Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 3(86), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.33607/bjshs.v3i86.266

Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2017). A meta-analysis of cooperative learning effects. Educational Research Review, 10, 1–15.

OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the survey of social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing.

Omojemite, M. D. (2025). Effectiveness of interactive teaching methods on students’ performance in social studies and civic education. Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Language, 5(1). https://jssal.com/index.php/jssal/article/view/171

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Sumardjoko, B., Prasetyo, A., & Subowo, A. (2025). Integrated Pancasila and Civic Education Learning Model for 21st Century. Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-386-3_19

Supriadi, S. (2019). Pengaruh pembelajaran inquiry based learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematik mahasiswa. Pedagogia, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/pdgia.v17i1.13527

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha in research instruments. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.

Wentzel, K. R. (2020). Peer relationships and motivation at school. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 1–15.

Wentzel, K. R., & Ramani, G. B. (2016). Social relationships and peer influence. In K. R. Wentzel & G. B. Ramani (Eds.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts (pp. 1–14). Routledge.

Winataputra, U. S., & Budimansyah, D. (2012). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam perspektif internasional. Dwitama Asrimedia.

Yanto, B. E., Subali, B., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Improving students’ scientific reasoning skills. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 689–704.

Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2016). Social-psychological interventions in education. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 321–351.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2015). Self-regulated learning. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 541–546). Elsevier.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Jannah, S. M., Triastuti, R., & Nuryadi, M. H. (2026). The Effectiveness of the Interactive KOMPAS Learning Model in Improving Junior High School Students’ Social Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(2), 3151–3159. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.9537

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): JUNE 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.