Negotiating Culture and Agency: Toraja Students’ Engagement with AI in English Language Learning

Authors

  • Viktor Siumarlata Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8274-1043
  • Yizrel Nani Sallata Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, Indonesia
  • Olim Natalia Tappa Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.8974

Keywords:

AI-mediated language learning, cultural identity, student agency, EFL learners, sociocultural learning

Abstract

The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in English language learning has generated growing interest in its pedagogical benefits and sociocultural implications. However, limited attention has been given to how students from local cultural communities interpret and negotiate AI use within their cultural contexts. This study explores how Toraja students engage with AI in English language learning and how such engagement relates to cultural identity and student agency.A qualitative case study design was employed involving nine Toraja undergraduate students with prior experience using AI tools in English learning. Data were collected over eight weeks through student assignment artifacts, semi-structured interviews, learning diaries, and focus group discussions. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns of practice, meaning-making, and cultural negotiation.The findings reveal four major themes. First, AI functioned as a learning partner that supported linguistic development, idea generation, writing organization, revision, and learner confidence. Second, students used AI as a source of global knowledge while recognizing its limited and often superficial representation of Toraja culture. Third, learners actively modified and enriched AI-generated content by adding local knowledge, correcting inaccuracies, and preserving cultural authenticity. Fourth, students expressed ambivalence toward AI, appreciating its efficiency while remaining concerned about dependency, cultural bias, and ethical use.The study shows that AI-mediated language learning is not culturally neutral but shaped by learners’ identities, values, and local knowledge. It highlights the importance of integrating critical AI literacy and culturally responsive pedagogy in English language teaching.

References

Abdallah, M. M. S. (2024). Using Self-Regulated Learning Supported by Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) Chatbots to Develop EFL Student Teachers ’ Self-Expression and Reflective Writing Skills. Academic Journal of Faculty of Education, Assiut University, 40(9), 1–60.

Aly, A. H., Nurhamidah, D., Pakuan, U., & Hidayatullah, U. I. N. S. (2025). EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON ( INDONESIA AND ENGLISH ). NDRUMI: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 8(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57094/ndrumi.v8i1.2907

Bender, E. M., & Mcmillan-major, A. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots : Can Language Models Be Too Big ? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Bhatti, A. (2025). AI as an Impediment to Linguistic Creativity in English Language Learners : A Comprehensive Review of a Literature. World Journal of English Language, 15(6), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n6p289

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education : a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Dja’far, V. H., & Hamidah, F. N. (2024). The Effectiveness of AI Technology in Improving Academic English Writing Skills in Higher Education. JOLLS: Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 4(3), 579–593. https://doi.org///doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v4i3.2031

Eaton, S. E. (2025). Global Trends in Education : Artificial Intelligence , Postplagiarism , and Future focused Learning for 2025 and Beyond – 2024 – 2025 Werklund Distinguished Research Lecture. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00187-6

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The Best of Both Worlds : A Critical Pedagogy of Place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003

Jasim, Y., Mohammed, Musa, H., Zainab, A. A., & Rawdhan Salman, A. (2024). Developing EFL Writing with AI: Balancing Benefits and Challenges. Technology Assisted Language Education TALE, 2(2), 80–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22126/tale.2024.10953.1052

Lier, L. van. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5

Lin, H., & Chen, Q. (2024). Artificial intelligence ( AI ) -integrated educational applications and college students ’ creativity and academic emotions : students and teachers ’ perceptions and attitudes. BMC Psychology, 12(487), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Mekheimer, M. (2025). Generative AI assisted feedback and EFL writing : a study on proficiency , revision frequency and writing quality. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00602-7

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). ossey-Bass.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis : Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Oktafia, N., Latifah, A. M., Dafa, A., & Haris, E. (2025). Mahasiswa dan AI : Transformasi Cara Berpikir Kritis dan Penyelesaian Masalah di Era Digital. Prosiding Konseling Kearifan Nusantara (KKN), 10–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29407/vpnfq046

Pangestu, H. P., & Suwartono, T. (2024). Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) Support in Assisting Students ’ English -Speaking Skills. English Education, Linguistics, and Literature Journal, 3(2), 134–147.

Peterson, A. J. (2025). AI and the problem of knowledge collapse. AI & Soc, 40, 3249–3269. https://doi.org///doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02173-x

Pryma, V., Pelivan, O., Teletska, T., Tsobenko, O., & Zagrebelna, N. (2025). AI Writing Assistants and Student Competence: A Linguistic Aspect. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence 2025, 319–329. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/AI.18

Siumarlata, V., & Arrang, J. (2023). Local Culture Topics for Prewriting and Drafting in Teaching Essay Writing at English Department UKI Toraja. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 9(2), 1035–1043. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v9i2.2842

Stockwell, G. (2024). Technology in Language Teaching & Learning ChatGPT in Language Teaching and Learning : Exploring the Road We ’ re Travelling. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.2273

Tandikombong, M., Kinda, S. R., & Siumarlata, V. (2024). INTEGRATING TORAJA CULTURAL VALUES INTO ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 13(May), 54–69.

Vieriu, A. M. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) on Students ’ Academic Development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343

Werdiningsih, I., Marzuki, & Rusdin, D. (2024). Balancing AI and authenticity: EFL students’ experiences with ChatGPT in academic writing. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org///doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2392388

Wiyono, E., Setyawan, A., & Mucholifah, U. H. (2024). IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LEARNING WITH AI AS A LEARNING ASSISTANT. Proceedings of International Conference on Applied Social Science in Education 2024, 01(01), 661–666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31316/icasse.v1i1.6931

Yan, Y., Liu, H., & Chau, T. (2025). A Systematic Review of AI Ethics in Education: Challenges, Policy Gaps, and Future Directions. Journal of Global Information Management, 3(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.386381

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publication, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Siumarlata, V., Sallata, Y. N., & Tappa, O. N. (2026). Negotiating Culture and Agency: Toraja Students’ Engagement with AI in English Language Learning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(2), 1754–1763. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i2.8974

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2026): JUNE 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.