School Readiness for Coding and AI Education: A Case Study of Policy Implementation and Pedagogical Adaptation in Indonesia

Authors

  • Bagus Sulasmono Universitas PGRI Indraprasta, Indonesia
  • Yuliana Friska Universitas PGRI Indraprasta, Indonesia
  • Supardi Uki Sajiman Universitas PGRI Indraprasta, Indonesia
  • Hasbullah Hasbullah Universitas PGRI Indraprasta, Indonesia
  • Syahfitri Purnama Universitas PGRI Indraprasta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.8910

Keywords:

education policy, digital education, coding, artificial intelligence, instrumental case study

Abstract

The educational transformation driven by the Industrial Revolution 4.0 necessitates digital literacy and computational thinking, reflected in Indonesia’s 2025 policy mandating Coding and AI as compulsory electives. This study examines policy implementation, student competency outcomes, barriers, and adaptive strategies within an early-adopting school context.A single instrumental case study was conducted at HelloMotion High School, selected for its pioneering role in digital curriculum integration prior to the national mandate. Data were collected from September to November 2025 through in-depth interviews with six key informants (one principal, one vice-principal, one teacher, and three students) and a survey of 99 students. Analysis employed Miles and Huberman’s interactive model alongside descriptive statistics.Findings reveal a “Literacy–Aspiration Gap,†where students demonstrated improved logical thinking (M = 3.35, SD = 0.91) but low interest in technology-related careers (M = 2.21, SD = 1.11). The primary challenges were identified as second-order barriers, including teacher beliefs and students’ “instant generation†mindset, rather than infrastructural limitations. In response, the school implemented an Integrative Strategy Model combining project-based learning with specialized, diverse grouping to enhance engagement and learning outcomes.The study highlights that successful implementation of Coding and AI education extends beyond infrastructure provision to addressing pedagogical and attitudinal barriers. It contributes to policy discourse by emphasizing the need for interventions targeting internal resistance and aligning skill development with student motivation, ensuring more effective and sustainable digital education reform.

Author Biography

Bagus Sulasmono, Universitas PGRI Indraprasta

Bagus Sulasmono is a doctoral candidate in Education at Indraprasta PGRI University. His research focuses on education. 

References

Abedi, E. A., & Ackah-Jnr, F. R. (2023). First-order barriers still matter in teachers’ use of technology: An exploratory study of multi-stakeholder perspectives of technology integration barriers. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 19(2).

Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). Science capital: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227

Bappenas. (2025). Peta jalan pendidikan Indonesia 2025–2045. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

Battersby, S. L., & Verdi, B. (2015). The culture of professional learning communities and connections to improve teacher efficacy and support student learning. Arts Education Policy Review, 116(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2015.970096

Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W. M., Petocz, P., & Alfano, M. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative artificial intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 15403–15439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0

Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y

Chernenko, V. P., Hrytsiuk, O. S., Kyrylakha, N. H., & Bryl, T. S. (2021). Development of logical thinking in creative computer science lessons using inventive problem-solving technology. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology,†7(3), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp.7(3).2021.9-17

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Dai, R., Thomas, M. K. E., & Rawolle, S. (2025). The roles of AI and educational leaders in AI-assisted administrative decision-making: A proposed framework for symbiotic collaboration. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52(2), 1471–1487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00771-8

Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implementation Science, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0

Elnaffar, S., Rashidi, F., & Abualkishik, A. Z. (2025). Teaching with AI: A systematic review of chatbots, generative tools, and tutoring systems in programming education. http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03884

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Haetami, H. (2025). AI-driven educational transformation in Indonesia: From learning personalization to institutional management. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2), 1819–1832. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.7448

Handayani, W., Hidayat, S., & Elan, E. (2025). Transformational leadership of school principals as a catalyst for digital learning implementation in primary schools. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(3), 1073–1084. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1826

Jin, Y., & Zha, S. (2020). Weave coding into K–5 curricula as new literacies. Information Discovery and Delivery, 48(2), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-09-2019-0069

Kemendikdasmen. (2025). Permendikdasmen No. 13 Tahun 2025 tentang perubahan atas Permendikbudristek No. 12 Tahun 2024 tentang kurikulum pada pendidikan anak usia dini jenjang dikdasmen. https://jdih.kemendikdasmen.go.id

Liang, M., Lim, C. P., Park, J., & Mendoza, N. B. (2023). A review of ICT-enabled learning for schoolgirls in Asia and its impacts on education equity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10178-w

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020, April 21). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Maxwell, D. (2024). Capacity building as a strategic tool for attainment of quality education in public schools in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 17(1).

Meral, M., Altun Yalçın, S., Çakır, Z., & Samur, E. (2024). The effect of STEM-based robotic coding education on primary school students’ decision-making skills. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 17(2), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1355818

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Niaty Beladinna, Muamaroh, M., & Muamaroh, E. F. (2025). Rural schools and the policy–practice gap: Teachers’ struggles with differentiated instruction in Eastern Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 2(3), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijets.v2i3.389

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Developing fundamental programming concepts and computational thinking with ScratchJr in preschool education: A case study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(3), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2016.077867

Raharjo, R. S., & Rohmadi, S. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Indonesian education: A critical review of ethical considerations, implementation challenges, and educational management perspectives. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 10(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.22515/attarbawi.v10i1.12141

Saad, A. (2022). The effectiveness of project-based learning with computational thinking techniques in a software engineering project course. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 12(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol12.1.6.2022

Saman, S., & Wahyudi, A. (2025). Manajemen inovasi pendidikan dalam mengintegrasikan teknologi digital di sekolah dasar: Peluang dan tantangan SDN 1 Bumi Dipasena Mulya. Edum Journal, 8(1), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.31943/edumjournal.v8i1.296

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.

Williamson, B., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Player-Koro, C., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Education recoded: Policy mobilities in the international “learning to code†agenda. Journal of Education Policy, 34(5), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1476735

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-03-29

How to Cite

Sulasmono, B., Friska, Y., Sajiman, S. U., Hasbullah, H., & Purnama, S. (2026). School Readiness for Coding and AI Education: A Case Study of Policy Implementation and Pedagogical Adaptation in Indonesia. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(1), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v18i1.8910

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): MARCH 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.