STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE TO ENGLISH SUMMATIVE AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT AT THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF MTs HUBBULWATHAN DURI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v10i2.80Keywords:
Attitude, Summative Assessment, Formative AssessmentAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sikap siswa terhadap penilaian sumatif dan formatif bahasa Inggris pada siswa kelas VIII MTs Hubbulwathan Duri, tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian survei yang menggunakan angket untuk mengumpulkan data. Angket tersebut terdiri dari 30 pernyataan yang berkaitan dengan sikap siswa terhadap penilaian sumatif dan penilaian formatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII MTs Hubbulwathan Duri. Ada 75 siswa sebagai sampel. Berdasarkan analisis data, peneliti menemukan bahwa sikap siswa bervariasi pada kedua komponen. Total rata-rata jawaban siswa 69.16% pada penilaian sumatif dan 78.54% pada penilaian formatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, ini menunjukkan bahwa sikap siswa terhadap penilaian sumatif dan formatif di kelas VIII MTs Hubbulwathan Duri adalah tinggi.
This research was aimed to find out the students’ attitude to English summative and formative assessment at the eighth grade students of MTs Hubbulwathan Duri, in the academic year 2017/2018. The type ofthe research was survey research which used questionnaire to collect the data. The questionnaire consisted of 30 items dealing with students’ attitude to summative and formative assessment. The subject of this research was the eighth grade students of MTs Hubbulwathan Duri. There were 75 students as sample. Based on the data analysis, the researcher found that the students’ attitude had various numbers for each component. The total mean of students’ answer was 69.16% in summative assessment and 78.54% in formative assessment. Based on the research finding, it shows that the students’ attitude to English summative and formative assessment
at the eighth grade of MTs Hubbulwathan Duri was high
References
Brown, H. Douglas. (2004). Language Assessment: Principle and Classroom Practice. San Fransisco: Person Education, Inc.
McLeod, S. A. (2014). Attitudes and Behavior. Retrieved 2017, from www.simplypsychology.org/attitudes.html.
Moss, Connie.M and Brookhart, Susan M. (2009). Advancing Formative Assessment in Every Classroom: A Guide for Instructional Leaders. United States: Group Work in Education.
Nitko, Anthony J. (1996). Educational Assessment of Students Second Edition. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.
Oosterhof, Albert. (2003). Developing and Using Classroom Assessment 2nd ed. Pearson Education : New Jersey.
Openheim, A.N. (2001). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. Basic Book, Inc : New York.
Peng, Juiching. (2010). Peer Assessment in an EFL Context: Attitudes and Correlations. Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum, ed. Matthew T. Prior et al., 89-107. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Pickens, Jeffrey. (2005). Attitude and Perception, Florida 43-76. Retrieved 2017, from http://www.47688_CH03_043_076.qxd. html.
Routledge. (2008). Assessment in Education. Taylor and France Group.
Thomas A. Angelo, K. Patricia Cross. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers - 2nd edition. Jossey Bass Publisher, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.