Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning Skills Through Board Game Media and the Adaptive Problem-Based Learning Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6340Keywords:
mathematical reasoning ability, differentiated learning, educational board game based on local wisdom, APBL modelAbstract
Mathematical reasoning is often underemphasized in basic education due to students’ difficulties in understanding mathematics. This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of board game media integrated with the Adaptive Problem-Based Learning (APBL) model in enhancing students’ mathematical reasoning skills. A mixed-methods approach was employed using a sequential exploratory design, beginning with qualitative research followed by a quantitative phase. The study was conducted at SD Kristen Satya Wacana (UKSW Laboratory) Salatiga. The developed board game, APBL model, and instructional materials underwent expert validation, yielding very high feasibility ratings of 84%, 95%, and 90%, respectively. The board game was then tested with 30 students, and data were collected through pretests, posttests, and practicality assessments. The implementation results showed a significant improvement in students' mathematical reasoning skills. The average pretest score of 62 increased to 84 in the posttest, reflecting a 35.48% achievement gain. Additionally, teacher and student responses in the practicality test yielded a 92% practicality score, categorized as very high. The findings indicate that integrating board game media with the APBL model effectively enhances mathematical reasoning. The model provides an engaging and structured learning experience that supports higher-order thinking skills while maintaining a practical and enjoyable classroom environment. The study concludes that board game media with the APBL model is highly effective and practical for improving mathematical reasoning. It is recommended for broader application across different education levels and learning contexts to enhance mathematics instruction.
References
Agustyaningrum, N., Hanggara, Y., Husna, A., Abadi, A. M., & Mahmudii, A. (2019). An Analysis Of Students ’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability On Abstract Algebra Course. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(12), 2800–2805.
Anggraeni, E. D., Kriswandani, Deswita, Y., & Robithoh, S. (2023). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Powerpoint Interaktif Terintegrasi Geogebra Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Statistika, 4(1), 432–445.
Ayal, C. S., Kusuma, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Dahlan, J. A. (2016). The enhancement of mathematical reasoning ability of junior high school students by applying mind mapping strategy. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(25), 50–58.
Darmastuti, R., Prasetya, B. E. A., & P, T. A. S. (2020). The Identity Construction of Solo’s Adolescent regarding “Narimo Ing Pandum.†Jurnal ASPIKOM, 5(2), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i2.687
Fathurrohman, M., Nindiasari, H., & Rahayu, I. (2022). A conventional and digital mathematical board game design and development for use by students in learning arithmetic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(4), 631–660. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i4.pp631-660
Febriyanti, R., Fuad, Y., & Masriyah, M. (2018). The Way of Students’ Reasoning of Elementary Students in Solving Integer Problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012033
Hamidi, F., Soleymani, S., Dazy, S., & Meshkat, M. (2024). Teaching Mathematics based on Integrating Reading Strategies and Working Memory in Elementary School. Athens Journal of Education, 11(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.11-1-1
Holm, J., & Kajander, A. (2020). Seeking Intersections: Math Degrees, Beliefs, and Elementary Teacher Knowledge. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00069-3
Hwang, J. (2019). Relationships among locus of control, learned helpless, and mathematical literacy in PISA 2012: focus on Korea and Finland. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0072-7
Hwang, J., Choi, K. M., & Hand, B. (2020). Examining Domain-General Use of Reasoning Across Science and Mathematics Through Performance on Standardized Assessments. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(3), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00108-4
Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8
Kusuma, D., Sukestiyarno, Y. ., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). The Characteristics of Mathematical Literacy Based on Students’ Executive Function. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 193–206.
Kusuma, D., Zaenuri, & Wardono. (2021). Mathematic creative thinking ability based on student metacognition in blended learning model with e-module. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042103
Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, C. Te. (2022). Effects of Technology-Enhanced Board Game in Primary Mathematics Education on Students’ Learning Performance. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211356
Mutia, M. (2021). Characteristics of Children Age of Basic Education. (pp. 114–131). Fitrah: International Islamic Education Journal.
O’Neill, D. K., & Holmes, P. E. (2022). The Power of Board Games for Multidomain Learning in Young Children. American Journal of Play, 14(1), 58–98. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1357958.pdf
Resnick, I., Newcombe, N., & Goldwater, M. (2023). Reasoning About Fraction and Decimal Magnitudes, Reasoning Proportionally, and Mathematics Achievement in Australia and the United States. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(1), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.8249
Thapliyal, M., Ahuja, N. J., Shankar, A., Cheng, X., & Kumar, M. (2022). A differentiated learning environment in domain model for learning disabled learners. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 60–82.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.