Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Technology Integration in EFL Instruction: Strategies for Fostering Autonomy and Overcoming Challenges in Indonesian High Schools

Authors

  • Nila Kencana Universitas Prof Dr Hazairin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6121

Keywords:

EFL instruction, technology integration, learner autonomy, collaborative learning, digital pedagogy, Indonesian high schools

Abstract

Technology integration is transforming English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction in Indonesian high schools. This study explores the role of technology in fostering student autonomy in EFL education and examines strategies employed by teachers to integrate technology effectively. A phenomenological approach was used, with data collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions involving 20 students and 5 teachers from diverse Indonesian high schools. Thematic analysis revealed that technology enhances student autonomy by providing access to extensive resources, fostering collaboration, and delivering instant feedback. Teachers play a critical role in creating learner-centered environments using platforms like Google Classroom and various digital tools. However, challenges such as limited access to technology and inadequate infrastructure impede seamless integration. The study underscores the need for targeted investments in infrastructure, equitable access to digital tools, and comprehensive teacher training to address these challenges. Recommendations include equipping educators with skills to leverage technology effectively, integrating collaborative platforms into the curriculum, and prioritizing underserved areas for infrastructure development. Policymakers are urged to bridge digital divides and foster partnerships with technology providers to create sustainable EFL solutions. The findings have significant implications for curriculum design, teacher training, and policy development, promoting equitable and impactful technology use in EFL classrooms. Future efforts should focus on workshops and training programs to empower teachers with practical strategies for enhancing learner autonomy and fostering collaboration through digital tools.

References

Ally, M. (2005). Using learning theories to design instruction for mobile learning devices. Mobile Learning Anytime Everywhere, 5-8.

Altınay, Z. (2017). Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(3), 312-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1232752

Bakar, S. (2007). The role of structured tasks in independent learning. In New perspectives on independent learning.

Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833767

Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University Press.

Blidi, S. (2017). Collaborative learner autonomy. Springer, 10, 978-981. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2048-3

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brown, A., & Green, T. (2018). Issues and trends in instructional technology: consistent growth in online learning, digital content, and the use of mobile technologies. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 41, 61-71.

Cahyani, H., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes and technology use in Indonesian EFL classrooms. Teflin Journal, 23(2), 130-148. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v23i2/130-148

Dewi, D. S., & Wilany, E. (2023). The relationship between learner autonomy and motivation in EFL speaking class. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 8(2), 194-208.

Dewi, D. S., Waloyo, E., & Ria, T. N. (2023, November). The impact of technology-based learning on students’ affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement in EFL higher education. In UNNES-TEFLIN National Conference (Vol. 5, pp. 167-179).

Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3).

Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Looking back and ahead: 20 years of technologies for language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 20(2), 5–12. http://doi.org/10125/44457

Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy is the ability to take charge of one’s own learning. Pergamon.

Kucukler, H. (2018). Graduate students' proficiency strategy attitudes on autonomous learning in foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 11(7), 142-145. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n7p142

Lee, L. (2006). Online language exchange communities: A tool for collaborative language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 119-138.

Lee, M. K. (2017). To be autonomous or not to be: Issues of subsuming self-determination theory into research on language learner autonomy. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.343

Mejeh, M., Sarbach, L., & Hascher, T. (2024). Effects of adaptive feedback through a digital tool–a mixed-methods study on the course of self-regulated learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1-43.

Ng, W., & Cumming, T. (2015). Sustaining mobile learning. Taylor & Francis.

Nguyen, T. H. H., Ho, T. N., Do, T. M. D., & Pham, T. T. T. (2024). Factors Affecting Learner Autonomy in EMI Studying of English-Major Students at some Economics Universities in Hanoi, Vietnam. International Journal of Language Instruction, 3(3), 36-53.

Pang, W. G. (2003). Self-regulated learning: Principles and educational applications. East China University Press.

Ponomariovienė, J., & Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. (2024). Solutions for independent goal setting and implementation of primary school students fostering the competence of learning to learn. Education sciences, 14(4), 368.

Pollard, A. (2015). Web-based journals in the classroom: Motivation and autonomous learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 20-31. https://doi/org/10.17509/ijal.v4i2.680

Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2017). Research agenda: Language learning beyond the classroom. Language Teaching, 50(4), 561-578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481700019

Tang, K. S., McLure, F., Williams, J., & Donnelly, C. (2024). Investigating the role of self-selected STEM projects in fostering student autonomy and self-directed learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1-25.

Van Campenhout, G., de Maeyer, S., & Tindale, R. (2015). The impact of feedback on self-regulated learning in language education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 44-58.

Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970

Zhou, R., & Bao, Y. (2018). The impact of achievement motivation on project-based autonomous learning: An empirical study on the 2017 NBEPC. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n11p31

Downloads

Published

2025-01-21

How to Cite

Kencana, N. (2025). Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Technology Integration in EFL Instruction: Strategies for Fostering Autonomy and Overcoming Challenges in Indonesian High Schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6121

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025): MARCH 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.