In-depth Analysis of Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills: Influence Factors Motivation and Effective Teaching Strategies

Authors

  • Yuliana Tririnika Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Imam Suryadi Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Isnandar Slamet Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5474

Keywords:

Problem-solving ability, PISA problem, Learning motivation

Abstract

Problem-solving (PS) skills are efforts to find solutions when faced with challenges. This study aims to examine students' mathematical PS skills by focusing on the influence of learning motivation and identifying factors that were previously overlooked. A qualitative approach with a case study design was used, where the researcher acted as the primary instrument. The research also utilized PISA-type test instruments, observation sheets, and interviews. PISA-type questions were designed around content, context, and process components, adhering to the PISA framework. The study was conducted in a school in Surakarta, chosen for its alignment with the minimum competency assessment system similar to PISA. Using snowball sampling, nine students were selected for response analysis. These students were categorized based on their motivation levels: high, moderate, and low. The results show that students with high motivation are proactive in problem-solving, directly addressing the problem, reviewing each step as they proceed, and ensuring accuracy. Moderately motivated students take more time, often using scratch paper, and review their work only at the end. Low-motivation students face greater difficulties, frequently making mistakes, relying heavily on scratch paper, and often skipping the review process due to time pressure. To improve PS skills, future research could explore the integration of interactive digital tools with instant feedback, adaptive learning platforms tailored to student motivation, and collaborative learning exercises. Additionally, incorporating real-world scenarios into problem-based learning could enhance engagement and develop deeper problem-solving abilities across different motivation levels.

References

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x

Argaw, A. S., Haile, B. B., Ayalew, B. T., & Kuma, S. G. (2017). The effect of problem based learning (PBL) instruction on students’ motivation and problem solving skills of physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 857–871. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00647a

Atiqoh, K. S. N. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Pada Materi Pokok Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. ALGORITMA: Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v1i1.11687

Bilah, S., Labuhan Batu, H., Noprianilubis, J., Panjaitan, A., Surya, E., & Syahputra, E. (2017). Analysis Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Student of the Grade VIII-2 Junior High. International Journal of Novel Research in Education and Learning, 4(2), 131–137. www.noveltyjournals.com

Chabibah, L. N., Siswanah, E., & Tsani, D. F. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024

Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex problem solving: What it is and what it is not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(JUL), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153

English, L. D., & Gainsburg, J. (2015). Problem Solving in a 21st-Century Mathematics Curriculum. Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education, Third Edition, 1(1), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448946-15

Farahhadi, S. D., & Wardono. (2019). Representasi Matematis dalam Pemecahan Masalah. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2(1), 606–610. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/issue/view/1445

Jaenudin, J., Nindiasari, H., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2017). Analysis of students’ reflective Mathematical thinking abilities judged from learning styles. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 69–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/prima.v1i1.256

Johansen, J. (1997). Bahia inicia uso de inseto transgênico contra dengue. Folha, 1, 24th Feb. https://doi.org/10.33024/jrets.v7i1.8634

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500

Jonassen, & H, D. (2010). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.

Jr, F. K. L., & Cai, J. (2016). Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems. Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems, 10(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3

Laila, Z., Aima, Z., & Yunita, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau Dari Minat Belajar Siswa. Horizon, 1(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.22202/horizon.v1i3.5257

Lee, S. Y. (2016). Students’ Use of “Look Back†Strategies in Multiple Solution Methods. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9599-9

Lester, F. K. (2013). Thoughts About Research On Mathematical Problem- Solving Let us know how access to this document benefits you . The Mathematics Enthousiasm, 10(1), 245–278.

Lexy J. Moloeng. (2019). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN KUALITATIF. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhaimin, L. H., Dasar, D., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2023). Numeracy-Ability, Characteristics of Pupils in Solving the Minimum Competency Assessment. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 697–707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6396

Muhaimin, L. H., & Kholid, M. N. (2023). Pupils ’ Mathematical Literacy Hierarchy Dimension for solving the minimum competency assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2727(020091), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141406

Muhaimin, L. H., Sholikhakh, R. A., & Yulianti, S. (2024). Unlocking the secrets of students ’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems : A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404

Patten, M. (2020). Planning Questionnaire Research. In Questionnaire Research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315265858-5

Pimta, S., Tayruakham, S., & Nuangchale, P. (2009). Factors Influencing Mathematic Problem-Solving Ability of Sixth Grade Students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.381.385

Purnamasari, I., & Setiawan, W. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi SPLDV Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i2.771

Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2016). Exploration of mathematics problem solving process based on the thinking level of students in junior high school. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7278–7285.

Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok - Not everyone can be good at mathâ€: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012

Safitri, I. (2018). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar dan Motivasi terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Alfarisi: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 1(3), 269–277. https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/alfarisi/article/view/8246

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). Mathematical problem solving. Elsevier.

Suhendri, H. (2011). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Matematis–Logis dan Kemandirian Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 1(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v1i1.61

Surya, E., & Putri, F. A. (2017). Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability and Self-Confidence of High School Students through Contextual Learning Model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85–94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1173627

Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113

Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(5), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020

Utami, R. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dan Self-Efficacy Siswa SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Ciamis Ratna. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.14897

Downloads

Published

2024-09-26

How to Cite

Tririnika, Y., Suryadi, I., & Slamet, I. (2024). In-depth Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills: Influence Factors Motivation and Effective Teaching Strategies. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(3), 3752–3766. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5474

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2024): AL-ISHLAH: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.