CIPP Evaluation Model and Its Effect on E-Learning

Authors

  • Darul Prayogo Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1071

Keywords:

Evaluation, CIPP, Effect, E-Learning

Abstract

One indicator of the quality of educational institutions is the use of information technology in teaching and learning activities. E-learning is fundamentally a teaching and learning activity using internet-based technology. This research aims to evaluate teaching and learning activities using e-learning. This study utilized the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model related to e-learning. The analysis technique used was multiple linear regression using R Software to see how much effect context and Input had on the learning process and how much Context and Input had on the learning product. Based on the study results, knowledge and understanding of the Context component were of more significant concern since 63 (44.68%) of 141 cadets stated ‘poor’. The average score of knowledge and understanding of the Input component was 41, which was in score interval 33 – 42, included in the good category. Moreover, the average score of knowledge and understanding of the Process component was 82, which was in score interval 65 - 84, included in the good category. Importantly, knowledge and understanding of the Product component were of greater concern since 69 (48.94%) of 141 cadets showed poor results. The effect size of Context and Input components on the process was 0.5479 or 54.79%, while the remaining 45.21% was affected by other factors not examined in this study. The input component had a significantly greater effect on the Process component with a significance level of 0.001 than the Context component. Moreover, the effect size of Context and Input components on the Product was 0.3303 or 33.03%, while the remaining 66.97% was affected by other factors not examined in this study. The context component had a significantly greater effect on the Product with a significance level of 0.001 than the Input component.

References

Gede, D., & Divayana, H. (2015). Evaluasi Program Penanggulangan HIV / AIDS Dengan Model CIPP Berbantuan Komputer. 9–10.

Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale: Development, reliability and validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146

Hussin, M. F., Wang, B., & Hipnie, R. (2012). The reliability and validity of Basic Offshore Safety and Emergency Training knowledge test. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 24(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2011.05.002

Junanto, S., & Kusna, N. A. A. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran di PAUD Inklusi dengan Model Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP). Inklusi, 5(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.050202

Kurnia, F., & Rosana, D. (2017). Developing evaluation instrument based on CIPP models on the implementation of portfolio assessment Developing Evaluation Instrument Based on CIPP Models on The Implementation of Portfolio Assessment. 080003(August). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995187

Lestari, S., Rosana, D., & Supahar. (2017). The Development of CIPP Evaluation Model Instruments on the Application of Science Project Learning Assessment. 4th ICRIEMS Proceedings, 57–64. http://seminar.uny.ac.id/icriems/sites/seminar.uny.ac.id.icriems/files/prosiding2017/SE10_SRI.pdf

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 6(1), 118.

Maló, P., Sarraipa, J., Jardim-Gonçalves, R., & Steiger-Garção, A. (2008). A training curriculum in collaboration for engineering management. IEMC-Europe 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Europe: Managing Engineering, Technology and Innovation for Growth, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4618035

Mirwati. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Kimia Pada Sma Negeri 3 Watansoppeng. Riset Assesmen, 1(1), 1–9. http://ojs.unm.ac.id/index.php/assesment/article/view/1781

Muyasaroh, M., & Sutrisno, S. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Cipp Pada Program Pembelajaran Tahfiz Al-Qur’an Di Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2862

Okta, D. P. (2015). Mengevaluasi Program Distance Learning Berdasarkan Model CIPP (Content, Input, Process, Product) [Universitas Negeri Semarang]. https://www.academia.edu/34740970/Mengevaluasi_Program_Distance_Learning_Berdasarkan_Model_CIPP_Content_Input_Process_Product

Solihat, A., Astuti, A. R., & Satriani, I. (2020). the Influence of Ice Breaker To Students’ Motivation in Teaching English. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 3(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v3i2.p210-216

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Suryaman, M., Cahyono, Y., Muliansyah, D., Bustani, O., Suryani, P., Fahlevi, M., Pramono, R., Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Munthe, A. P., Juliana, & Harimurti, S. M. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and home online learning system: Does it affect the quality of pharmacy school learning? Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(8), 524–530. https://doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.8.74

Vignoli, M., Punnett, L., & Depolo, M. (2014). How to measure safety training effectiveness? Towards a more reliable model to overcome evaluation issues in safety training. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 36, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1436012

Waehrer, G. M., & Miller, T. R. (2009). Does Safety Training Reduce Work Injury in the United States? The Ergonomics Open Journal, 2(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875934300902010026

Warju, W. (2016). Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502

Yulianti, D. P. (2017). Implementasi Hse Passport Di Pt. Pertamina Ep Asset 2 Prabumulih Field. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 6(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijosh.v6i1.2017.116-123

Downloads

Published

2022-03-29

How to Cite

Prayogo, D. (2022). CIPP Evaluation Model and Its Effect on E-Learning. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1071

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2022): AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.